Scotland vote sets up new independence clash with London

The Scottish National Party on Sunday said its landslide victory in Edinburgh’s devolved parliament was grounds for a fresh independence referendum, despite opposition from London.

While the SNP campaigned on promises to hold a new vote, the UK government — which would need to give formal legal permission — is opposed, raising fears of a protracted political and legal battle.

Now the nationalists say their slightly increased share of seats, one short of an overall majority of 65, gives them a mandate for “indyref2”, so-called after the “no” vote in Scotland’s first independence vote in 2014.

Scottish media stressed the SNP’s strong showing, with The Herald on Sunday headlining its front page simply with the word “Landslide”.

But UK-wide newspapers had a different take, as The Sunday Telegraph declared “Sturgeon falls short of the majority”.

SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon said in her victory speech that Westminster now has “no democratic justification” to deny a second independence referendum.

“I hope to lead Scotland to independence,” she told the BBC on Sunday.

She said that it would be “absurd and completely outrageous” for the referendum to lead to a legal wrangle in the Supreme Court, as could happen if Westminster blocked it and the Scottish parliament passed its own legislation.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has said the 2014 referendum where 55 percent voted “no” should be a once-in-a-generation event.

Wouldn’t play well

Johnson said Saturday that the SNP’s aim of a second referendum was “irresponsible and reckless” while he wrote a public letter to Sturgeon asking her to “work together” in “Team UK.”

Sturgeon told the BBC that she thought the UK government ultimately would not stand against the referendum because this would come across as disrespectful of Scots’ democratic rights.

“It would mean that the Conservative government had refused to respect the democratic wishes of the Scottish people,” she said.

“I think it is an understatement to say that that wouldn’t play well.”

On Sunday, senior UK minister Michael Gove sought to downplay the brewing conflict.

He insisted in comments to the BBC that for all UK leaders including Sturgeon the priority is recovery from the coronavirus pandemic and claimed the country did not have time now for a “protracted conversation about the Constitution”.

Gove also argued that the fact that the SNP does not have an outright majority in the devolved parliament — as they did before the first referendum in 2014 — made a “significant difference”.

Asked whether Scotland was allowed to leave the UK, however, he said: “Of course it is… through a legal referendum which would allow people to make that choice”.

With the Scottish Greens also backing a referendum, Holyrood now has a stronger majority of pro-independence politicians than before, with 72 seats out of 129.

“The immediate problem is that the Conservative government at Westminster will say no in the short term,” Dr. Lynn Bennie, a reader in politics at the University of Aberdeen, told AFP.

The UK government has the remit to grant or refuse a referendum despite the debate about democratic rights, she stressed.

“You basically have two governments coming together in a sort of democratic log jam and it’s very hard to see how this will be resolved.”

Check Also

Death toll in Turkish quake surpasses 1,000 – authorities

The disaster has also left over 7,600 injured and destroyed several thousand buildings A powerful …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *